Message Forum: Re: Equiptment and Party

Re: Equiptment and Party

Posted By: essgee, on host 195.92.67.75
Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 02:46:35
In Reply To: Re: Equiptment and Party posted by Grishny on Tuesday, July 27, 2004, at 05:26:56:

> The only thing I'd have changed is that I wouldn't bother keeping a sorceror and a wizard around. I'd make them druids too, since the spells are the same and druids learn all of them.

That's one piece of advice I have to disagreee with. A sorceror and a wizard in the same party pick up all the spells far quicker than two druids do. It's much more efficient to retrain a wizard with all the spells as a sorceror (and vice versa) than to convert to a druid. And druids are lousy fighters.

Actually, wizards don't add much to a party at the lower levels. My 6-man party of choice starts with two knights, two wizards and two sorcerors. When you have all the spells, retrain the wizards as sorcerors, and one or both of the sorcerors as assassins.

Replies To This Message

Re: Equiptment and Party - commie_bat - Wed, 7/28/2004, 06:15:43
- Re: Equiptment and Party - essgee - Wed, 7/28/2004, 14:58:16
  - Re: Equiptment and Party - commie_bat - Wed, 7/28/2004, 17:06:06
    - Re: Equiptment and Party - SPOILERS - Deadman - Thu, 7/29/2004, 12:07:21
      - Re: Equiptment and Party - SPOILERS - Grishny - Thu, 7/29/2004, 13:57:45
        
        Re: Equiptment and Party - SPOILERS - commie_bat - Fri, 7/30/2004, 06:03:39

Post a Reply

Note: If you are posting a hint request for Adventure Games Live, be sure to specify which game you are talking about and list your inventory so other players know where you are in the game.

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > The only thing I'd have changed is that I wouldn't bother keeping a sorceror and a wizard around. I'd make them druids too, since the spells are the same and druids learn all of them. > > That's one piece of advice I have to disagreee with. A sorceror and a wizard in the same party pick up all the spells far quicker than two druids do. It's much more efficient to retrain a wizard with all the spells as a sorceror (and vice versa) than to convert to a druid. And druids are lousy fighters. > > Actually, wizards don't add much to a party at the lower levels. My 6-man party of choice starts with two knights, two wizards and two sorcerors. When you have all the spells, retrain the wizards as sorcerors, and one or both of the sorcerors as assassins.
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.