Message Forum: Re: Sandwich poll, part two

Re: Sandwich poll, part two

Posted By: Balanthalus, on host 208.58.193.182
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2002, at 12:54:35
In Reply To: Re: Sandwich poll, part two posted by Ellmyruh on Wednesday, May 8, 2002, at 11:53:03:

> I haven't seen a convincing argument against this statement yet, although I suppose Balanthalus' idea of putting peanut butter on both sides of the bread could be a happy middle ground for all concerned. However, that's entirely too much peanut butter for one sandwich, in my opinion, so I'm still going with my original statement.

"Entirely" . . . "too much" . . . huh?! Too mcuh peanut butter on a sandwich is something I've never encountered. I mean, it's theoretically possible; I guess you could use 3 or 4 jars or something, but that'd just be silly.

Bal"Did I mention I'm a PB lover?"anthalus

Post a Reply

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email:		(optional)
Subject:
Message:	> > I haven't seen a convincing argument against this statement yet, although I suppose Balanthalus' idea of putting peanut butter on both sides of the bread could be a happy middle ground for all concerned. However, that's entirely too much peanut butter for one sandwich, in my opinion, so I'm still going with my original statement. > > "Entirely" . . . "too much" . . . huh?! Too mcuh peanut butter on a sandwich is something I've never encountered. I mean, it's theoretically possible; I guess you could use 3 or 4 jars or something, but that'd just be silly. > > Bal"Did I mention I'm a PB lover?"anthalus
Link URL:		(optional)
Link Title:		(optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.