>
> > > If so, then, would having a smaller party cause each character's experience to go up faster?
> > >
> > > Same applies for gold and treasure chests.
> > >
>
> > > > You are entirely correct. A smaller party will get more experience and gold per member than a bigger party.
> >
> > I generally amass about 10000 experience when going from Kaliti to Perinn with just my Wizard, but less than 1000 experience per member when I have a full party.
>
>
> Ai... that doesn't seem very fair. I've had the problem of smaller parties getting killed a lot more easily.
>
> At least this gives a chance for the Good Samaritan "Wandering Adventurer" to "come across the bodies of my party and drag them back to town."
>
> How exactly does he drag six people, equipment and all, by himself?!? Would have thought he'd need a wagon... if such things fit in Murkon's labyrinth...
>
> I now realise I'm blabbing. I shall stop.
>
> So I suppose I have to find a balance between larger, slow-at-leveling-up parties, and smaller, get-killed-easily parties?
>
> *sigh* Oh, for the times when the only parties I had to worry about were of the celebration sort...
>
> ;-) Thank you, Sam. We all love you. :-)

The balance is a level-80 Wizard-turned-Sorcerer-turned-Assassin. I had one of those, and nothing at all could kill him. He only needed to heal once against Murkon.

Yay for First Bat The Second!

^v^:)^v^
FB