Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: should I be happy with this group?
Posted By: commie_bat, on host 132.216.67.72
Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 12:51:20
In Reply To: should I be happy with this group? posted by warlock on Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 10:04:08:

> Probable spoilers ahead
> 30
> 29
> 28
> 27
> 26
> 25
> 24
> 23
> 22
> 21
> 20
> 19
> 18
> 17
> 16
> 15
> 14
> 13
> 12
> 11
> 10
> 9
> 8
> 7
> 6
> 5
> 4
> 3
> 2
> 1
> 0
>
> My current party is three assassins (lvls 21, 17, and 20), a lvl 17 wizard-ex-sorceror who knows every spell, a lvl 21 druid and a lvl 17 druid-ex-wizard who knows every W spell.
>
> Should I press on or should I retrain one of the assassins as a druid and one of the druids (probably the lvl 21 one, once he fills out the spell lists) as an assassin? (I'm leaning towards a final party of A, A, A, W, D, D)

I find three Assassins (for physical attacks) and three spellcasters (for mass attacks) to be an almost ideal combination. Personally, I like to have one Wizard-turned-Assassin, just so I can have magic points in reserve for healing spells between battles and for DISARM. There's a phase where you need a lot of your spellcasters' magic points for battle spells.

If you're down on the ninth level, you can level up a new character at will, so there's no harm in having six spellcasters, three of which are Assassins.

^v^:)^v^
FB

Post a Reply

Note: If you are posting a hint request for Adventure Games Live, be sure to specify which game you are talking about and list your inventory so other players know where you are in the game.

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email: (optional)
Subject:
Message:
Link URL: (optional)
Link Title: (optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.