Main      Site Guide    
Message Forum
Re: Real Music
Posted By: Jezzika, on host 24.55.102.6
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 23:32:01
In Reply To: Real Music posted by Grishny on Tuesday, December 4, 2001, at 13:44:46:

> Okay, here's my opinion. Billy Joel has some
> catchy tunes. So do a host of others. But will
> they stand the test of time? How do we know
> their popularity isn't just a flash-in-the-pan
> phenomenon?
>

So what if they are? Why should we get all cerebral and pretentious over what music appeals to us? It's called pop music for a reason. I don't feel like writing an essay entitled "The Enduring Worth Of The Police" just because I think they're cool. :)

> How 'bout this: Bach, Beethoven, Mozart,
> Vivaldi, Brahms, Chopin, Mendelssohn, Liszt,
> Berlioz, Strauss, Wagner, Puccini, Haydn,
> Handel, Tchaikovsky, Katchaturian, Mahler,
> Boccherini, Saint-Saens, DeBussy, and Tallis
> rule. Billy Joel and the host of others... they
> rock.
>
> Gri"c'est mon avis"shny

Maybe only 1% of the Earth's population know who those composers are, and a small fraction more only know their music from Warner Bros cartoons. So do they *really* rule?

Replies To This Message

Post a Reply

RinkChat Username:
Password:
Email: (optional)
Subject:
Message:
Link URL: (optional)
Link Title: (optional)

Make sure you read our message forum policy before posting.