Message Forum: Re: who to vote for

Re: who to vote for

Posted By: gabby, on host 206.64.3.208
Date: Saturday, October 14, 2000, at 17:25:03
In Reply To: who to vote for posted by shadowfax on Friday, October 13, 2000, at 22:02:12:

> So basically, we don't have ANYONE who is qualified for the job. What are we to do?

If you aren't for anyone strongly, just vote for the lesser of two weasels.

gab"Awful, stupid pun"by

Replies To This Message

Re: who to vote for - gabby - Sat, 10/14/2000, 17:58:44
- Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Wed, 10/18/2000, 13:48:46
  - Re: who to vote for - gabby - Wed, 10/18/2000, 16:17:13
    - Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Thu, 10/19/2000, 06:26:18
      - Re: who to vote for - gabby - Fri, 10/20/2000, 11:29:10
      - Re: who to vote for - Howard - Thu, 10/19/2000, 06:41:09
        
        Re: who to vote for - Beasty - Thu, 10/19/2000, 11:10:21
        
        Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Thu, 10/19/2000, 06:48:36
        
        Re: who to vote for - Brunnen-G - Thu, 10/19/2000, 13:49:22
        
        Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Mon, 10/23/2000, 06:43:24
        
        Re: who to vote for - gabby - Sat, 10/21/2000, 19:42:35
        
        Re: who to vote for - Ellmyruh - Sun, 10/22/2000, 20:55:31
        
        Re: who to vote for - gabby - Mon, 10/23/2000, 15:01:36
  - Re: who to vote for - Speedball - Wed, 10/18/2000, 15:58:46
    - Re: who to vote for - Faux Pas - Thu, 10/19/2000, 06:38:44
- At least politics isn't going to the dogs. - Howard - Sun, 10/15/2000, 18:34:48
- Re: who to vote for - eric sleator - Sat, 10/14/2000, 18:45:44
  - Re: who to vote for - gabby - Sat, 10/14/2000, 19:56:22