> > > I've not much to say about this subject, except that TV will neither make nor break your life. I don't understand how people can think of television as something that controls them, and I've never bought into the idea of "I had no say in the matter - television made me what I am." Extend that argument a bit (okay, maybe more than a bit) and you get to people who say that playing Doom makes kids go on gun rampages. Honestly, now. I agree with Sam, in that television does provide something to do to the exclusion of other things one could do - that's more or less a tautology. But I don't believe that telvision turns kids into reclusive, antisocial underachievers - people are responsible for their own behaviour. No blaming the television for how you did or didn't turn out.
> >
> > Darien, I agree with you for the most part. It's absolutely ludicrous to suggest that "television made me do it," or "the internet made me do it." I read about some guy who was on trial for murder and his defense was that he was "intoxicated by the internet." Ridiculous. If it was true that playing violent video games caused kids to go on killing sprees, then I should have gone on one long ago; I used to play Doom, Mortal Kombat, Quake, etc. with the best of them.
> >
> > However....
> > What all this violence *can do* (not that it always necessarily does) is de-sensitize us to to it. A five year old child IS going to be affected by watching violence on television and by playing games in which they run around with a trigger finger blowing away anything that moves. You are right that those things can't be pointed to as the ONE and only cause for someone's becoming a violent adult, but I believe they are one factor among many. In the end, though, each person is responsible for their own actions.
> >
> > Gri"hmm..that was worth about 2 cents,wasn't it?"shny
>
>
> I could probably carry on a very animated, two-sided debate with myself on this subject, simply because we debated this very topic last semester. When all is said and done, who IS responsible for the children that "go bad?"
>
> Psychologists have found a correlation between children watching violent television shows and children acting violently. However, there are so many exceptions to this correlation. It basically comes down to the obvious fact that every person is different. Some children are born with violent tendencies, while others are not. At one point, I thought of adding a genetics major to my college education because it is truly fascinating to realize that two children can watch the same violent television show and be affected differently. One child will imitate the actions seen on TV, while the other child will be shocked and horrified by the television show.
>
> To cut things short, it all comes down to the point that each child is different and the parents must realize this. The child that is prone to act violently is not destined to become the next Charles Manson. The parents of that child must recognize the violent tendency and turn it into good. With proper guidance, that aggressive child can do amazing things. Rather than becoming a murderer, that child can become the very animated courtroom lawyer that convinces a jury to keep a killer off the streets.
>
> Ell"I could go on and on, but I won't."myruh

If 9999 kids out of 10,000 are not affected by the violent video games they play, and the other one goes to school and shoots up the place, isn't that too many?
How"keeping the discussion going"ard